
Coconut Macaroon
MAC Coconut Macaroon Oh Sweetie Lipcolour ($17.50 for 0.10 oz.) is a soft, pinky-peach with warm undertones and a metallic sheen. It had semi-opaque color coverage in a single layer, though it wasn’t the type of texture that worked well for layering as then it felt too heavy, too thick, and too creamy. There was some product in my deeper lip lines. It had a lightweight, moderately emollient texture that felt slippery on my lips for the first hour of wear, and after that, it felt more adhered and almost “clingy” with less glossiness. This shade stayed on well for four and a half hours on me and was neither drying nor hydrating. I could smell coconut quite strongly in the tube, but I also got hit with some mint, which was unexpected. I didn’t notice any taste.
Top Dupes
- Cle de Peau Modern Pink (2) (P, $48.00) is less glossy (95% similar).
- MAC Water Deities (P, $10.00) is darker, cooler (90% similar).
- Huda Beauty Ritzy (P, $18.00) is more muted (90% similar).
- NARS Embrasse Moi (LE, $28.00) is warmer (90% similar).
- Makeup Geek VIP (P, $15.00) is darker (90% similar).
- Tom Ford Beauty Open Kimono (P, $54.00) is cooler (85% similar).
- Tom Ford Beauty Graham (P, $36.00) is more muted (85% similar).
- Urban Decay Fireball (LE, $18.00) is less shimmery, darker, less glossy (85% similar).
- Giorgio Armani Luce (101) (P, $38.00) is less shimmery (85% similar).
- Tom Ford Beauty Pink Dune (02) (LE, $50.00) is darker, brighter (85% similar).
- More dupes -- click to see the full list!
Formula Overview
$17.50/0.10 oz. - $175.00 Per Ounce
The formula is supposed to have "lasting colour" for "eight hour" wear that's "hydrating" and "non-feathering" that comes in "frosted opaque hues." There are 15 shades in the range, and each one has its own distinct scent--tied to its name--and most of the scents were pretty dead-on but I could see those with more sophisticated noses finding some scents a little cloying or synthetic. I didn't notice the scents lingering for long after I applied the respective shade, and I didn't notice any tastes. The coverage ranged from semi-opaque to opaque, while the application was inconsistent, and I think it'll come down to how one wants to wear a particular shade (layered or alone) whether the application pitfalls (settling into lip lines, unevenness) of some shades will be deal-breakers.
The finish on most shades was very shiny and metallic with an initial glossiness that took an hour to three to wear down; most shades felt like a lipstick and gloss hybrid but I can see why MAC has it listed as a lipstick. Once the glossiness goes away, the remaining color and finish look a lot more like a lipstick than a gloss, and it felt clingier (some more than others) and seemed to adhere better. The texture is lightweight, smooth, and mostly non-sticky, so there was more slip and creaminess compared to something like Lipglass, and it didn't have the dry down of a Retro Matte Lipcolour.
They definitely did not wear for eight hours--that claim felt really over-the-top to me--and most shades lasted between four and six hours with a few deviating from that range. There's enough product in an application that a good amount of color comes through after drinking a coffee or glass of water (despite transfer). They were lightly hydrating at best but some seemed more non-drying over time. One upside was that getting colors in this finish (metallic/pearl with some shine) and opacity level (even when they weren't opaque) made them less dupable, though I looked for dupes across lipstick and gloss options.
Browse all of our MAC Oh Sweetie Lipcolour swatches.
Ingredients


Limited Edition

Caramel Sugar
MAC Caramel Sugar Oh Sweetie Lipcolour ($17.50 for 0.10 oz.) is a deep brown with warm, copper pearl. It had good pigmentation that applied evenly across my lips, though there was a touch of product that gatheredin my lip lines. I didn’t feel like that was noticeable from a normal viewing distance. The texture was lightweight, creamy and emollient without being heavy or tacky. It took an hour and a half before it felt more “set” on my lips, where the product lost its creaminess and felt a bit thinner and clingier (but not in a bad way). This shade lasted well for five hours and was non-drying. It smelled like a sweet, rich caramel–not too sweet–and had a very slight, sweet taste.
Top Dupes
- Huda Beauty Foxy (P, $18.00) is more shimmery, lighter (90% similar).
- Urban Decay Roach (P, $18.00) is darker (90% similar).
- MAC Gilded Age (LE, $21.00) is lighter, warmer (90% similar).
- Bite Beauty Bronze Pearl (P, $22.00) is warmer, glossier (90% similar).
- Milk Makeup Angel (P, $24.00) is less shimmery, lighter, brighter (85% similar).
- NYX New Era (P, $7.50) is darker, cooler, less glossy (85% similar).
- Makeup Geek Headliner (P, $15.00) is darker, cooler (85% similar).
- MAC Viva Glam Taraji P. Henson 2 (LE, $18.50) is darker, cooler, less glossy (85% similar).
- Tom Ford Beauty Aaron (P, $36.00) is less shimmery, cooler (85% similar).
- Kevyn Aucoin Bronze (P, $30.00) is less shimmery, darker (85% similar).
- More dupes -- click to see the full list!
Formula Overview
$17.50/0.10 oz. - $175.00 Per Ounce
The formula is supposed to have "lasting colour" for "eight hour" wear that's "hydrating" and "non-feathering" that comes in "frosted opaque hues." There are 15 shades in the range, and each one has its own distinct scent--tied to its name--and most of the scents were pretty dead-on but I could see those with more sophisticated noses finding some scents a little cloying or synthetic. I didn't notice the scents lingering for long after I applied the respective shade, and I didn't notice any tastes. The coverage ranged from semi-opaque to opaque, while the application was inconsistent, and I think it'll come down to how one wants to wear a particular shade (layered or alone) whether the application pitfalls (settling into lip lines, unevenness) of some shades will be deal-breakers.
The finish on most shades was very shiny and metallic with an initial glossiness that took an hour to three to wear down; most shades felt like a lipstick and gloss hybrid but I can see why MAC has it listed as a lipstick. Once the glossiness goes away, the remaining color and finish look a lot more like a lipstick than a gloss, and it felt clingier (some more than others) and seemed to adhere better. The texture is lightweight, smooth, and mostly non-sticky, so there was more slip and creaminess compared to something like Lipglass, and it didn't have the dry down of a Retro Matte Lipcolour.
They definitely did not wear for eight hours--that claim felt really over-the-top to me--and most shades lasted between four and six hours with a few deviating from that range. There's enough product in an application that a good amount of color comes through after drinking a coffee or glass of water (despite transfer). They were lightly hydrating at best but some seemed more non-drying over time. One upside was that getting colors in this finish (metallic/pearl with some shine) and opacity level (even when they weren't opaque) made them less dupable, though I looked for dupes across lipstick and gloss options.
Browse all of our MAC Oh Sweetie Lipcolour swatches.
Ingredients


Limited Edition

Creamy Peach Pie
MAC Creamy Peach Pie Oh Sweetie Lipcolour ($17.50 for 0.10 oz.) is a medium, orange-coral with warm undertones and a soft, pearly sheen. It had nearly opaque pigmentation with a smooth, lightly creamy texture that was lightweight and easy to work with. There was a bit of product that gathered in my deeper lip lines, but the reflective finish hid most of that from a normal viewing distance. It started to feel more “set” after an hour of wear, where the creaminess dissipated and the lipstick felt more adhered to my lips. It wore well for five hours and was non-drying. The product smelled like a sweet peach, a little bit synthetic, and didn’t seem to have any taste that I could detect.
Top Dupes
- Revlon HD Sunstone (565) (P, $8.99) is brighter (90% similar).
- Chanel Teheran (412) (P, $37.00) is lighter (90% similar).
- MAC CB96 (P, $18.50) is darker, less glossy (90% similar).
- Estee Lauder Heavenly (P, $30.00) is less shimmery, cooler (85% similar).
- Tom Ford Beauty Solar Affair (LE, $52.00) is less shimmery (85% similar).
- Gucci Beauty Fever (P, $39.00) is less shimmery, cooler, less glossy (85% similar).
- More dupes -- click to see the full list!
Formula Overview
$17.50/0.10 oz. - $175.00 Per Ounce
The formula is supposed to have "lasting colour" for "eight hour" wear that's "hydrating" and "non-feathering" that comes in "frosted opaque hues." There are 15 shades in the range, and each one has its own distinct scent--tied to its name--and most of the scents were pretty dead-on but I could see those with more sophisticated noses finding some scents a little cloying or synthetic. I didn't notice the scents lingering for long after I applied the respective shade, and I didn't notice any tastes. The coverage ranged from semi-opaque to opaque, while the application was inconsistent, and I think it'll come down to how one wants to wear a particular shade (layered or alone) whether the application pitfalls (settling into lip lines, unevenness) of some shades will be deal-breakers.
The finish on most shades was very shiny and metallic with an initial glossiness that took an hour to three to wear down; most shades felt like a lipstick and gloss hybrid but I can see why MAC has it listed as a lipstick. Once the glossiness goes away, the remaining color and finish look a lot more like a lipstick than a gloss, and it felt clingier (some more than others) and seemed to adhere better. The texture is lightweight, smooth, and mostly non-sticky, so there was more slip and creaminess compared to something like Lipglass, and it didn't have the dry down of a Retro Matte Lipcolour.
They definitely did not wear for eight hours--that claim felt really over-the-top to me--and most shades lasted between four and six hours with a few deviating from that range. There's enough product in an application that a good amount of color comes through after drinking a coffee or glass of water (despite transfer). They were lightly hydrating at best but some seemed more non-drying over time. One upside was that getting colors in this finish (metallic/pearl with some shine) and opacity level (even when they weren't opaque) made them less dupable, though I looked for dupes across lipstick and gloss options.
Browse all of our MAC Oh Sweetie Lipcolour swatches.
Ingredients


Limited Edition

MAC Coconut Macaroon Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Coconut Macaroon Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Coconut Macaroon Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Coconut Macaroon Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Coconut Macaroon Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Coconut Macaroon Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Caramel Sugar Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Caramel Sugar Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Caramel Sugar Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Caramel Sugar Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Caramel Sugar Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Caramel Sugar Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Creamy Peach Pie Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Creamy Peach Pie Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Creamy Peach Pie Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Creamy Peach Pie Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Creamy Peach Pie Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Creamy Peach Pie Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Coconut Macaroon Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Coconut Macaroon Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Coconut Macaroon Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Coconut Macaroon Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Coconut Macaroon Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Coconut Macaroon Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Caramel Sugar Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Caramel Sugar Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Caramel Sugar Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Caramel Sugar Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Caramel Sugar Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Caramel Sugar Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Creamy Peach Pie Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Creamy Peach Pie Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Creamy Peach Pie Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Creamy Peach Pie Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Creamy Peach Pie Oh Sweetie Lipcolour

MAC Creamy Peach Pie Oh Sweetie Lipcolour